Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Patricia Manderola Calata

€ 275 ...

The figure to which I refer are the 275 Euros I perceived a fellow of the Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, to the period practices fall / winter 2008-2009, as monthly compensation contact the Office of the Council Secretariat to the United Nations. Yes, the tickets are subject to reimbursement to the equivalent price of a ticket-Wagonlitt Carlson (CWL), better-known travel agency in these latitudes bruxelenses *, from anywhere in the EU to the airport west of the EU (as Alumni Office), which says it is the Shannon in Ireland. I think that is because the price level offered by the Council CWL (with all its options, advance booking is entitled to cancellation and modification) is equivalent to the price of a ticket price that you and I buy it.

These practices are, without doubt, a unique option to do this kind of practice. A unique experience in the intended anyone can learn a lot, and then become an excellent spokesperson, or spokesman, of the excellent work that the community personnel stationed there performed. I think experiences like that I point out are great and should be promoted. Europe has to give the widest possible access to "Europeanized" in their activities. It is the best advertisement possible.

However, in regard to these practices I would make a reflection / constructive criticism:

To make these practices is necessary to a diplomatic visa type the U.S., G-3 type **. Is achieved without problems since it is the EU itself who is responsible for processing. The visa from seeking work, or work beyond the institutional activity "in the U.S.. Therefore
:
Can any citizen of the Union to these practices? The answer is clear: NO. Only those who financially can have a living (family, loan, money saved ...). That is, from a legal and economic practices are only available for 'elite'.
Also, there is the possibility that someone, once received the 'call fellow UN-EU' does not say no to this opportunity, and launched into the adventure. And as part of the adventure begins to work illegally in a job, surely low-skilled-waiter on weekends, for example. What if working in an inspection reveals that there are a young European diplomat working with visas illegally? Is it a scandal? Does the EU should not consider a reform of the grants in the Foreign Service?

I think we should strengthen the scholarship in European institutions beyond our borders. I am sure that practices outside the EU are a unique experience for the benefit and an excellent opportunity for the EU to sell, borders in his work. I think we should encourage such practices, but I also believe that we must ensure it works even better, or risk having a mishap diplomat who make them blush with shame European elites ...

currently compensates the fellows Secretariat with about 1275 Euros a month to the graduate trainees and 0 Euros for those who do not have ...

And now the question: for 25 euro cents Spain Will you take any action in this regard during the term of his presidency? ;-)

* Someday I will speak of Carlson-Wagonlitt ...
** Diplomatic The G-3 visa is a nonimmigrant visa issued to representatives of foreign governments not recognized by the U.S. to enter into the U.S. to work for an international organization and not for personal business or pleasure. The staff and immediate family members of principal G-3 visa holders also qualify for G-3 visa.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Bollywood Actresses Without Clothes Showing Boobs

Pirates and doubts ...

Este domingo tengo varias dudas, algunas de ellas bastante polémicas:
Es cierto que el secuestro por parte de unos piratas de un Pesquero español, abanderado en las Seychelles –donde los impuestos son un tanto más bajos que en España…- es un atentado y un delito, del cual los principales sufridores son los secuestrados de diferentes nacionalidades –entre ellos Españoles, como bien es sabido-. Sin embargo, creo upon the subject, and its derivations, is acting a little demagogic way that leads to confusion, which highlight a.
Relatives of the kidnapped English-relatives of the other hostages do not know anything, 'demanding' the government to release the two pirates were detained by our armed forces deployed in the area as part of the Atalanta. However, I ask myself is it the government responsible for the release of alleged offenders awaiting trial? Is it not incumbent upon the Court, and that's where the defendants liable responsible for their release as long as the accused prove their innocence? Can the Government change a judicial decision of the High Court? Should we give in to blackmail from terrorists? Would we accept this kind of blackmail if it were, for example, ETA? Surely
my doubts, hiding an almost upon, are not politically correct, but someone has a solution to it ... Or maybe my right gaps are wider than I think ...